Ramrameshwari Devi and Ors. Vs. Nirmala Devi and Ors.

Para 4: This is a classic example which abundantly depicts the picture of how the civil litigation moves in our courts and how unscrupulous litigants (appellants in this case) can till eternity harass the respondents and their children by abusing the judicial system.

Para 27: The learned Single Judge observed that even according to Order 14 Rule 2 Civil Procedure Code the court has to pronounce the judgment on all issues notwithstanding that the case may be disposed of on preliminary issue. Order 14 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code is reads as under:

2. Court to pronounce judgment on all issues:

(1) Notwithstanding that a case may be disposed of on a preliminary issue, the Court shall, subject to the provisions of sub-rule (2), pronounce judgment on all issues.
Para 28: Sub Rule 2 refers to the discretion given to the court where the court may try issue relating to the jurisdiction of the court or the bar to the suit created by any law for the time being in force as preliminary issue.

It further relates to the disposal of the suit treating these points as preliminary issues and also relates to deferring the settlement of other issues, but there is no such case. The entire evidence has been led, the matter is at the stage of final arguments and the point raised does not relate to the point pertaining to Sub Rule 2. Neither it relates to bar created by any law nor the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the suit. It is just an averment made in the plaint. Contention of the appellants for treating the said issue as preliminary issue is against the spirit of law as referred in Order 20 Rule 5 and Order 14 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code. These observations of the courts below are correct and in pursuance of the provisions of the Act.

Para 38: It is abundantly clear from the facts and circumstances of this case that the appellants have seriously created obstacles at every stage during the course of trial and virtually prevented the court from proceeding with the suit. This is a typical example of how an ordinary suits move in our courts. Some cantankerous and unscrupulous litigants on one ground or the other do not permit the courts to proceed further in the matter.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *